GimmeABreak
Research Enthusiast
yet another scam from Tracy at QSC!
- Thread starter Catpepti
- Start date
noteablequotable
Registered
Probably not because they come highly recommended by people who have radically different expectations than the normal person.
QSC should NEVER be anyone's first purchase unless they know exactly what they've signed up for. Sorry you had to figure this out the hard way @Catpepti
Last edited:
noteablequotable
Registered
@exploitedworkerbee are you allowed to make new forums or forum subsections? We desperately need a place for newbies.
YoYoFat
Senior Member
I think you need to adjust your expectations with QSC. You'll get it when you get it.
The bank accounts aren't frozen, but when they get temporary blocked on bank request due to a large flow of bank transfers especially the ones that contains irreponsible messages mentionning illegal goods and stuff like that, the transfers that aren't confirmed by us are systematically refunded, and the refund in the banking system is via the original route, which can take few days for some banks, and up to 4-6 weeks for some others. That's the US/EU system that has nothing to do with us.
I ain't getting rich thanks to your pitiful $130, everyone gets his order, no one gets scammed with QSC.
Posts like this won't speed up the process, but just make you look like a clown.
I ain't getting rich thanks to your pitiful $130, everyone gets his order, no one gets scammed with QSC.
Posts like this won't speed up the process, but just make you look like a clown.
keangkong
Registered
My QSC order arrived sooner than my SRY order, even though I placed the SRY order a few days before the QSC order. To be clear, I am not complaining about either order.
scarywood75
Member
Aaaah ok now I understand the reason why you made that other post.
Well, we can't save them if they can't read unfortunately, so try to see these posts as a form of entertainment instead.
Animal_Mother
Registered
New here but I am curious about this. Do you have a source I can read?
Sorry I missed this. Nope, I’m not able to make those types of changes to the forum. One of these days Zippity will be back from Narnia and can do it.
Peak Karen remark right here. Someone really needs to get the manager involved.
A merchant took my money and did not give any update for weeks. Only after I accused them of being scammer they stated they posted an update on their social media of bank issues.
Is this normal in any part of the world or in history of transactions ever?
No, this is not normal or acceptable in the context of business transactions, either historically or in most regions today. The key issues here involve lack of communication, transparency, and customer service. Let's break it down:
1. Lack of Communication:
A merchant is responsible for keeping their customers informed about delays or issues with fulfilling an order. The burden is on them to proactively communicate via the channels they used to conduct the transaction (e.g., email, phone, or their website). Expecting customers to monitor social media for updates is unprofessional unless explicitly agreed upon as the main communication channel.
2. Transparency and Trust:
In commerce—both historically and in modern times—trust is fundamental. Merchants who fail to maintain transparency risk being perceived as dishonest or unreliable. If there were legitimate issues with their bank or payment systems, they should have promptly communicated this directly to affected customers.
3. Professional Standards:
While occasional delays or technical issues happen, established norms in commerce dictate that merchants address these promptly and respectfully. Blaming customers for being upset (or labeling them as accusatory when they express concerns) is contrary to good customer service practices.
4. Historical Context:
Even in older systems of trade, merchants were expected to honor their agreements, whether through direct communication or established reputation. Failure to deliver goods or services without explanation would often result in loss of business, reputation damage, or legal consequences.
If this happened to you, you have every right to feel frustrated. Depending on the amount involved and the merchant’s response, you may want to consider filing a complaint with relevant consumer protection authorities or pursuing a refund through your payment provider.
lol having chatgpt defend your Karen remarks might actually push it to a new level of Karen.
A user responded with this: lol having chatgpt defend your Karen remarks might actually push it to a new level of Karen.
Whats his problem?
It sounds like the user is dismissing your valid concerns by labeling your frustration as "Karen-like," which is often used (sometimes unfairly) to characterize someone as being overly demanding or entitled. This response might be intended to trivialize the issue rather than engage with the legitimate problem you've raised.
The issue here is likely a misunderstanding or lack of empathy for your position. You’re addressing a genuine concern about a merchant’s failure to communicate and provide updates, which is entirely reasonable. The user's comment may reflect a lack of context or an inclination to deflect rather than discuss the issue seriously.
If their intent was to mock or provoke, it's more a reflection of their attitude than anything wrong with your concerns. It's okay to set the record straight if you feel comfortable doing so, or you can choose to disengage if the comment isn’t constructive.
noteablequotable
Registered
I think you're being a little harsh. They're right. QSC is not known for their great communication skills. They obviously handle a large volume of customs and that negatively impacts their responsiveness.
On an unrelated note: can you ask Zippity for forum superpowers? Please
Should i expect a high level of communications when buying gray market pharmaceuticals from overseas from a vendor known by everyone in the community to have poor communications?
ChatGPT said:
No, you should not expect a high level of communication when purchasing from a vendor already known for poor communications, especially in the gray market pharmaceutical space. Such vendors often prioritize discretion over customer interaction due to the nature of their business. If communication is critical to you, consider seeking out an alternative vendor with a better reputation for responsiveness, even if they are less popular or slightly more expensive.
It’s just goofy when people demand bans of a vendor for acting exactly as they always have because whatever expectation the Karen has created themselves are not being met. Qsc is what it is, and is not making promises of anything else. They set expectations appropriately and then deliver accordingly. They are not scamming, it’s a Karen move to say they are because you want them to change their established methods. The non-Karen move would be to find someone who does meet their expectations and shop there instead.I think you're being a little harsh. They're right. QSC is not known for their great communication skills. They obviously handle a large volume of customs and that negatively impacts their responsiveness.
On an unrelated note: can you ask Zippity for forum superpowers? Please
