MiniatureSnail
Member
I'll just quote stairmaster1 directly so i don't screw up the details again. If anyone knows if there is a policy against this let me know and I'll remove. Also edited the name of the individual Cain tried to influence so as not to doxx anyone.
Again, I really appreciate Stairmaster1 taking this seriously, especially with the number of newer people he's mentoring, having a zero tolerance policy for this stuff and explaining why its unacceptable is huge plus to the larger grey market peptide world.
While this does provide more context, I still do not understand how someone (Person X, in this case) could directly affect the results of a group test if they are not the one collecting the vials and never handled them (which, it sounds like in this situation, she didn't).
If everyone involved in the group test sends their vials directly to the lab, but Person X just helps facilitate by making a spreadsheet and organizing funds - how does that at all change what the test results will be?
Even if Person X was being supplied known high quality samples to contribute, that one vial would still be an outlier of the batch as a whole didn't test well.
What am I missing here?