I'm not a business person. However, I'll note that many of the moves that Chinese vendors make do not make business sense as far as I can understand. Remember Zeropeptidegate, where all at once vials from several vendors turned out not to contain peptides? Well, there was one vendor, ASC, that had always charged more than other vendors and had a great reputation. Wouldn't it make sense that at least that vendor, who charges a premium, would reimburse buyers who received zero peptides? In doing so, that vendor would earn the trust of its buyers, who'd likely forgive it for sending zero peptides in the first place. ASC would likely have gained many new buyers from places that didn't honor their warranties. Yet ASC then disappeared. By the way, I almost always understand the business reasons that Eli Lilly acts as it does.