Do You Filter Your Peptides Before Use?

I'm in NY.

People died. The elderly are STILL dying (though these are people who could have been taken out by flu, too.)
My understanding is that most of the people who died had some preexisting condition that was complicated by the virus. Unlike a previous accusation on here, I know a lot of people from all of the Country. As selfish as it sounds, I work in an industry that never slowed down during the “pandemic” and I recall several of my coworkers and employees using COVID as an excuse to miss work, only to be seen on Facebook doing anything but suffering. Maybe I’m just jaded.
 
Woah I bet you really wow the kids at parties.

I’m a statistics and science guy who has worked in semiconductor production and bio-pharma production, what have you done?

Let’s break what you said down and what you are implying by linking this study:
- Contamination implies “you are going to have an adverse reaction.” Incorrect on so many levels. Cars can go without an oil change for 30,000 miles and not suffer an adverse reaction. Is that a good idea? No, can you predict each individual responses? No.

- as it’s obvious you don’t really understand statistically relevant versus data, your phone has a HUGE level of contamination, in fact all of our phones probably do (that’s just data). People who have a reaction to this contamination (statistically relevant) is most likely well below 1%, which could be caused by lower immune systems, worse hygiene, already sick, etc.

filters are designed to prevent statistically relevant outcomes that apply to the filtering process (small bacteria/foreign materials existing in the source). Filters are NOT designed to stop re-sticking a vial and the contamination subsequent to that.

The rules of:
- Don’t use BAC water past 30/60 days once punctured
- Don’t use peptides past 30/60 days once reconstituted + punctured
- Clean the cap prior to every stick with alcohol pad

Those rules exist to lower your chance of a statistically relevant event related to contamination which is NORMAL in use.

Many people go well beyond these limits and are just fine, because we make rules based on high risk aversion.

Many fantastic independent studies in this community have been done even on peptide degradation that drastically go over recommended maximum frozen storage levels (2-3 years) proving that risks are relatively low on using product frozen for even 4-5 years. I bet by your thought process there is a 25% chance those people must have keeled over by now
The cost/benefit analysis was a clever illustration, I liked it!
I do think that person needs to get a refund on the charm school he went to.
 
My understanding is that most of the people who died had some preexisting condition that was complicated by the virus. Unlike a previous accusation on here, I know a lot of people from all of the Country. As selfish as it sounds, I work in an industry that never slowed down during the “pandemic” and I recall several of my coworkers and employees using COVID as an excuse to miss work, only to be seen on Facebook doing anything but suffering. Maybe I’m just jaded.
I can absolutely confirm it was not only patients with preexisting conditions when it first happened. But the strains out there are milder now as far as I know.
 
Nobody wants you here. (I’m sure you are used to hearing that.) You have been here for a few days and now everyone is dumber for having seen your posts. Your poor grammar alone is enough for people to not take you seriously, but the nonsense you regurgitate from the internet takes your idiocy to a whole new level. Be gone!
@AndyPanda I find your ankle-biting commentary very helpful, fwiw
 
As a recovering intravenous meth addict (sober 19 years). I can assure you, the filter is a waste of money. We used a spoon and pulled off the cotton from a q-tip with our bare fingers as a filter. You'll be just fine. LOL
I shouldn't laugh, but I can tell you're really funny!
Also, well done on the 19 yrs
 
My understanding is that most of the people who died had some preexisting condition that was complicated by the virus. Unlike a previous accusation on here, I know a lot of people from all of the Country. As selfish as it sounds, I work in an industry that never slowed down during the “pandemic” and I recall several of my coworkers and employees using COVID as an excuse to miss work, only to be seen on Facebook doing anything but suffering. Maybe I’m just jaded.
Being overweight is one of those pre-existing conditions. Huge comorbidity risk with covid.

A hell of a lot of the world, and America in specific, is overweight. Shit, that's why I'm here.
 
The cost/benefit analysis was a clever illustration, I liked it!
I do think that person needs to get a refund on the charm school he went to.
I appreciate that, I think many people just assume that statistics and probabilities are some kind of nebulous concept that rarely provoke a direct answer, but if you take those concepts and apply real life numbers, the math can give you an EXACT yes/no answer.

There is still some interpretation to what I stated as to how often a vial is “dangerous” to use (this information would be VERY hard to obtain), but I doubt the numbers are far off from reality in terms of risk (I was probably being a bit conservative)

There is a fantastically written book on this, Algorithms to live by, that gives people concrete answers to basic questions of life. Things like “how long should I search for a house when I’m interested in buying”, there is an actual number of days that has the highest probability of being ideal based on when you want to be done searching.
 

Trending content

Forum statistics

Threads
3,030
Messages
51,012
Members
6,153
Latest member
guanaquita
Back
Top