zpped
Registered
Damn I missed all the fun.
As someone who does filter, I don't think its all that critical.
As someone who does filter, I don't think its all that critical.
My understanding is that most of the people who died had some preexisting condition that was complicated by the virus. Unlike a previous accusation on here, I know a lot of people from all of the Country. As selfish as it sounds, I work in an industry that never slowed down during the “pandemic” and I recall several of my coworkers and employees using COVID as an excuse to miss work, only to be seen on Facebook doing anything but suffering. Maybe I’m just jaded.I'm in NY.
People died. The elderly are STILL dying (though these are people who could have been taken out by flu, too.)
Best answer ever! You win the internet today. lol We’ve lost course.Damn I missed all the fun.
As someone who does filter, I don't think it’s all that critical.
The cost/benefit analysis was a clever illustration, I liked it!Woah I bet you really wow the kids at parties.
I’m a statistics and science guy who has worked in semiconductor production and bio-pharma production, what have you done?
Let’s break what you said down and what you are implying by linking this study:
- Contamination implies “you are going to have an adverse reaction.” Incorrect on so many levels. Cars can go without an oil change for 30,000 miles and not suffer an adverse reaction. Is that a good idea? No, can you predict each individual responses? No.
- as it’s obvious you don’t really understand statistically relevant versus data, your phone has a HUGE level of contamination, in fact all of our phones probably do (that’s just data). People who have a reaction to this contamination (statistically relevant) is most likely well below 1%, which could be caused by lower immune systems, worse hygiene, already sick, etc.
filters are designed to prevent statistically relevant outcomes that apply to the filtering process (small bacteria/foreign materials existing in the source). Filters are NOT designed to stop re-sticking a vial and the contamination subsequent to that.
The rules of:
- Don’t use BAC water past 30/60 days once punctured
- Don’t use peptides past 30/60 days once reconstituted + punctured
- Clean the cap prior to every stick with alcohol pad
Those rules exist to lower your chance of a statistically relevant event related to contamination which is NORMAL in use.
Many people go well beyond these limits and are just fine, because we make rules based on high risk aversion.
Many fantastic independent studies in this community have been done even on peptide degradation that drastically go over recommended maximum frozen storage levels (2-3 years) proving that risks are relatively low on using product frozen for even 4-5 years. I bet by your thought process there is a 25% chance those people must have keeled over by now
I can absolutely confirm it was not only patients with preexisting conditions when it first happened. But the strains out there are milder now as far as I know.My understanding is that most of the people who died had some preexisting condition that was complicated by the virus. Unlike a previous accusation on here, I know a lot of people from all of the Country. As selfish as it sounds, I work in an industry that never slowed down during the “pandemic” and I recall several of my coworkers and employees using COVID as an excuse to miss work, only to be seen on Facebook doing anything but suffering. Maybe I’m just jaded.
I shouldn't laugh, but I can tell you're really funny!As a recovering intravenous meth addict (sober 19 years). I can assure you, the filter is a waste of money. We used a spoon and pulled off the cotton from a q-tip with our bare fingers as a filter. You'll be just fine. LOL
Being overweight is one of those pre-existing conditions. Huge comorbidity risk with covid.My understanding is that most of the people who died had some preexisting condition that was complicated by the virus. Unlike a previous accusation on here, I know a lot of people from all of the Country. As selfish as it sounds, I work in an industry that never slowed down during the “pandemic” and I recall several of my coworkers and employees using COVID as an excuse to miss work, only to be seen on Facebook doing anything but suffering. Maybe I’m just jaded.
I appreciate that, I think many people just assume that statistics and probabilities are some kind of nebulous concept that rarely provoke a direct answer, but if you take those concepts and apply real life numbers, the math can give you an EXACT yes/no answer.The cost/benefit analysis was a clever illustration, I liked it!
I do think that person needs to get a refund on the charm school he went to.