Buncha prices here, tesa 10 was $180 in October:Cain just put out a presale for Tesa and I don’t know if it is just me, but it looks like his prices are going up. Has anyone tracked this?
Thank you. After looking at that I came to the conclusion that I am just spoiled by the prices of QYC, SRY and a few other vendors. I think the Nexaph website and payment options create a false sense of security for me as well.Buncha prices here, tesa 10 was $180 in October:
https://glp1forum.com/threads/spc-n...irzepatide-15mg-kit-promo-185.1294/post-23177
Just to be clear this is for non-GLP's. Tirz, Reta, Sema etc are still 99%.That theory would explain why Cain is now stating that 98% purity is his new standard of acceptability .... is another reason for me not to buy from him till he clears up what's going on...
It was throw-away Reta. If the test showed that there was no additional degradation it might have been free, usable Reta. Why not throw in a couple of bucks to see?Buying it from nexaph and following it up with a numega test result.
Really questioning the general publics decision making at this point.
I'm not following, what is Sabrina's relationship with this lab?The full results that Sabrina F worked on for over a week (our testing group paid for the tests and paid for the vials, but her work was volunteered, a gift to us) was 6 mb and too big to upload here. If you are interested in seeing some of the results you can join the "Full Spectrum Testing server" on discord. Her tests are in a google folder that are shared in the server. Currently up for testing are Mots-C from several vendors, the GYC 40 mg Tirze and NAD+ from several vendors. Here is an invite link if you are interested: https://discord.gg/yguV4haC
Just being funny. Don't expend too many iq points on meIt was throw-away Reta. If the test showed that there was no additional degradation it might have been free, usable Reta. Why not throw in a couple of bucks to see?
Also, purchased from a Raven GB that happened to be with the same supplier as Cain or maybe it was purchased through Cain, not sure at this point.
From what I understand, Sabrina is a scientist that works in a lab but not the Numega lab used to test the reta. She recently started her own testing site on Discord and orders the testing from different labs depending on what she or users want tested. She gets the results back and then provides an analysis of the results.I'm not following, what is Sabrina's relationship with this lab?
Because you've said she worked on these results for over a week, unpaid.
But Sabrina said this wasn't her lab nor was she affiliated with it.
This feels shady, I'm hoping there's a reasonable explanation.
I will save both time and money for everyone who asks this question in the future.If this is the case, why did Nexaph/Cain/Baba use this formula in the first place.
Thank you for the clarification! From what I hear from her, she has received 25 hostile messages on discord since yesterday. Being a scientist who loves peptide and has put in many unpaid hours so far toward furthering understanding about the quality of our peptides, that really is discouraging.... I wonder, who would have a vested interest in discouraging her from doing this work???? hmmmmmmm..... I kinda do have a sense who might like her to stop..... alas, since a person can have many aliases around here, it's hard to say, isn't it?From what I understand, Sabrina is a scientist that works in a lab but not the Numega lab used to test the reta. She recently started her own testing site on Discord and orders the testing from different labs depending on what she or users want tested. She gets the results back and then provides an analysis of the results.
Her idea was to go beyond mass/purity testing on the defunct reta to gain a better understand what is causing it to degrade so quickly and if it makes it completely unsafe to use. Typically when a pep degrades it loses its effectiveness, but in this case because it is degrading over weeks (instead of months) whatever is causing the degradation could be dangerous to inject. If this is the case, why did Nexaph/Cain/Baba use this formula in the first place.
I wouldn't pay her to do testing for me but I've been providing samples for her group. Stuff that's already been tested elsewhere.I’m all for her doing her work but given the circumstances it’s not out of line to do a little side-by-side comparison between this brand new entrant and a trusted lab. That’s not slander, it’s just sensible. If she stands up under scrutiny then there is nothing to argue about. Until then though I’m remaining skeptical.
Does she know the compounds and expected fill, or is she taking them blind?I wouldn't pay her to do testing for me but I've been providing samples for her group. Stuff that's already been tested elsewhere.
This is the first I have heard about SSA Reta issues. I wonder if they are using the same raws and/or lyophilizer?Btw this reta issue is not just affecting Nexaph, I've seen 2 other reporting the same, SSA (Sigma Audley) and another one I can't find back.
I think so, otherwise that's a weird coincidence.This is the first I have heard about SSA Reta issues. I wonder if they are using the same raws and/or lyophilizer?
Damn, I am looking forward to getting the testing process started on the reship reta 12. We probably won't have results until mid-January though. It will be about one-month out from the time it was shipped. Plus add two weeks for vial collection and shipping to Jano it should make it roughly 8-10 weeks from manufacture date and six-weeks or so from the previous Jano test of the same batch.I think so, otherwise that's a weird coincidence.
its not usually for hplc test. (although hplc requires to know the compound before hand) But for NMR tests that identify unknown fillers and a few other things.Does she know the compounds and expected fill, or is she taking them blind?
The movie right here! I used to be 😳
I don't think anyone can definitively answer this question. Could have stronger side effects or different side effects. It would also be difficult to accurately dose. If you are pinning 6mg and the purity is 90% it would be a 5.4mg dose if it is 80% it would be a 4.8mg dose. Given the lag time between dose and feelz I am not sure how you use it if you wanted to.I mean what happens if you pin a 90% pep on avg? Is it just less potent or can it uhhh turn into fibril soup lol
Noted. I will dump mine. Still have the replacement, their cagri and just got a batch of Sema off them. : /I don't think anyone can definitively answer this question. Could have stronger side effects or different side effects. It would also be difficult to accurately dose. If you are pinning 6mg and the purity is 90% it would be a 5.4mg dose if it is 80% it would be a 4.8mg dose. Given the lag time between dose and feelz I am not sure how you use it if you wanted to.
At the end of the day it was replaced and for me, it's not worth the risk to pin. Into the trash it goes.
Oh cool, I hope she gets some traction and proves to be reliable.its not usually for hplc test. (although hplc requires to know the compound before hand) But for NMR tests that identify unknown fillers and a few other things.
Easiest way to know what's going on... check out the server, I posted a link to it...... recent completed test Amo T60 and QSC T30, results are published in a google folder.... unfortunately the files are too big to upload, otherwise I would..... I am learning a lot there.... here is the link again: https://discord.gg/yguV4haCDoes she know the compounds and expected fill, or is she taking them blind?
Nooooo!!!