Nexaph testing

Is my Reta part of the compromised batch or no? Just catching up on this thread but I’m a Customer and haven’t been following lately. Just wondering. Thx!
Update: I did receive a replacement batch (just checked my packages today)…so that’s cool. I’m also currently pinning a vial from the compromised batch and I’m still alive.
 
Cain!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5813.jpeg
    IMG_5813.jpeg
    40.8 KB · Views: 2
Kinda like the people that wired money to qsc for the Black Friday deals that are in limbo because the wires are getting rejected? Or worse they’re losing their money?
How is a third party app refusing to complete a transaction a vendors fault though? It's a shitty situation, but.....idk what we expect to happen here and yet another risk of dealing in the industry.
 
Kinda like the people that wired money to qsc for the Black Friday deals that are in limbo because the wires are getting rejected? Or worse they’re losing their money?
I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make. I am offering up a comparison because don’t believe in blind loyalty to any vendor. I’ve had solid transactions with QSC so far but I am aware there is always a risk of things going sideways. This is true of any vendor so the illusion of customer service doesn’t sway me.

With the volume that QSC does (>7mil in their BTC wallet) it’s not surprising that things fall through the cracks or mistakes are made but I have also seen many cases of users not following the correct format and then calling out Tracy when it was their own error.
 
I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make. I am offering up a comparison because don’t believe in blind loyalty to any vendor. I’ve had solid transactions with QSC so far but I am aware there is always a risk of things going sideways. This is true of any vendor so the illusion of customer service doesn’t sway me.

With the volume that QSC does (>7mil in their BTC wallet) it’s not surprising that things fall through the cracks or mistakes are made but I have also seen many cases of users not following the correct format and then calling out Tracy when it was their own error.
QSC wasn’t the only vendor to have issues with rejected wise payments this past week either.
 
QSC wasn’t the only vendor to have issues with rejected wise payments this past week either.
Even though it’s still a little nerve wracking, I prefer the crypto route. I also know there’s something with QSC, if you do bank transfer, I think it has to come out of checking and not savings, but I’m not sure.
 
Even though it’s still a little nerve wracking, I prefer the crypto route. I also know there’s something with QSC, if you do bank transfer, I think it has to come out of checking and not savings, but I’m not sure.

I've had good experiences with ASC. They still offer PayPal, and while there have been some hiccups they are incredibly quick to resolve things in a way that favors the customer (offering refunds and replacements instead of discounts and credits). They actually had a stock issue on my very first order and not only did they let me know as soon as they realized it, they gave me a refund within a few minutes of me deciding on that solution.

So far as I know they don't need to run any clinical trials so I feel safer working with them than Nexaph (for now).
 

Trending content

Forum statistics

Threads
1,777
Messages
28,126
Members
3,345
Latest member
Kiddodera
Back
Top