Nexaph testing

[chmuse]

This makes me much more comfortable about buying from SNP knowing that clinical trials are being run.

Look, I never implied I'm clever.

 

[JohnnyGobbs]

Is my Reta part of the compromised batch or no? Just catching up on this thread but I’m a Customer and haven’t been following lately. Just wondering. Thx!

Update: I did receive a replacement batch (just checked my packages today)…so that’s cool. I’m also currently pinning a vial from the compromised batch and I’m still alive.

 

[JohnnyGobbs]

Cain!

 

[nccane]

Kinda like the people that wired money to qsc for the Black Friday deals that are in limbo because the wires are getting rejected? Or worse they’re losing their money?

How is a third party app refusing to complete a transaction a vendors fault though? It's a shitty situation, but.....idk what we expect to happen here and yet another risk of dealing in the industry.

 

[noteablequotable]

This makes me much more comfortable about buying from SNP knowing that clinical trials are being run.

It's been so tense around here but that one definitely got me

 

[nurseratchit]

Kinda like the people that wired money to qsc for the Black Friday deals that are in limbo because the wires are getting rejected? Or worse they’re losing their money?

I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make. I am offering up a comparison because don’t believe in blind loyalty to any vendor. I’ve had solid transactions with QSC so far but I am aware there is always a risk of things going sideways. This is true of any vendor so the illusion of customer service doesn’t sway me.

With the volume that QSC does (>7mil in their BTC wallet) it’s not surprising that things fall through the cracks or mistakes are made but I have also seen many cases of users not following the correct format and then calling out Tracy when it was their own error.

 

[glpfun]

I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make. I am offering up a comparison because don’t believe in blind loyalty to any vendor. I’ve had solid transactions with QSC so far but I am aware there is always a risk of things going sideways. This is true of any vendor so the illusion of customer service doesn’t sway me.

With the volume that QSC does (>7mil in their BTC wallet) it’s not surprising that things fall through the cracks or mistakes are made but I have also seen many cases of users not following the correct format and then calling out Tracy when it was their own error.

QSC wasn’t the only vendor to have issues with rejected wise payments this past week either.

 

[nurseratchit]

QSC wasn’t the only vendor to have issues with rejected wise payments this past week either.

Even though it’s still a little nerve wracking, I prefer the crypto route. I also know there’s something with QSC, if you do bank transfer, I think it has to come out of checking and not savings, but I’m not sure.

 

[noteablequotable]

Even though it’s still a little nerve wracking, I prefer the crypto route. I also know there’s something with QSC, if you do bank transfer, I think it has to come out of checking and not savings, but I’m not sure.

I've had good experiences with ASC. They still offer PayPal, and while there have been some hiccups they are incredibly quick to resolve things in a way that favors the customer (offering refunds and replacements instead of discounts and credits). They actually had a stock issue on my very first order and not only did they let me know as soon as they realized it, they gave me a refund within a few minutes of me deciding on that solution.

So far as I know they don't need to run any clinical trials so I feel safer working with them than Nexaph (for now).

 

[nurseratchit]

I've had good experiences with ASC. They still offer PayPal, and while there have been some hiccups they are incredibly quick to resolve things in a way that favors the customer (offering refunds and replacements instead of discounts and credits). They actually had a stock issue on my very first order and not only did they let me know as soon as they realized it, they gave me a refund within a few minutes of me deciding on that solution.

So far as I know they don't need to run any clinical trials so I feel safer working with them than Nexaph (for now).

ASC was my 2nd grey order and also a good experience for me. The only thing I noticed recently is that they only guarantee >98% purity whereas most other vendors guarantee >99%. I’ve reached out to Tuk about this but, as far as I know that hasn’t changed. My product tested over 99% but just something to keep in mind when considering future purchases. I would also be careful about using PayPal to send directly to a vendor. Have seen several people getting accounts shut down if PP deems it suspicious.

 

[noteablequotable]

ASC was my 2nd grey order and also a good experience for me. The only thing I noticed recently is that they only guarantee >98% purity whereas most other vendors guarantee >99%. I’ve reached out to Tuk about this but, as far as I know that hasn’t changed. My product tested over 99% but just something to keep in mind when considering future purchases. I would also be careful about using PayPal to send directly to a vendor. Have seen several people getting accounts shut down if PP deems it suspicious.

I can confirm. I bought a mix of non- GLP-1 peps from them and 2/6 came back at 98%. When I asked about it they said that was standard, but they seemed open to discussing resolutions if I was unhappy. I dropped it since 98% is perfectly fine to use, but it's something to keep in mind.