Look, I never implied I'm clever.
Nexaph testing
- Thread starter DwightTheDelight
- Start date
JohnnyGobbs
New_Member
Update: I did receive a replacement batch (just checked my packages today)…so that’s cool. I’m also currently pinning a vial from the compromised batch and I’m still alive.
JohnnyGobbs
New_Member
How is a third party app refusing to complete a transaction a vendors fault though? It's a shitty situation, but.....idk what we expect to happen here and yet another risk of dealing in the industry.
noteablequotable
Senior Member
nurseratchit
Research Enthusiast
I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make. I am offering up a comparison because don’t believe in blind loyalty to any vendor. I’ve had solid transactions with QSC so far but I am aware there is always a risk of things going sideways. This is true of any vendor so the illusion of customer service doesn’t sway me.
With the volume that QSC does (>7mil in their BTC wallet) it’s not surprising that things fall through the cracks or mistakes are made but I have also seen many cases of users not following the correct format and then calling out Tracy when it was their own error.
QSC wasn’t the only vendor to have issues with rejected wise payments this past week either.
nurseratchit
Research Enthusiast
Even though it’s still a little nerve wracking, I prefer the crypto route. I also know there’s something with QSC, if you do bank transfer, I think it has to come out of checking and not savings, but I’m not sure.
noteablequotable
Senior Member
I've had good experiences with ASC. They still offer PayPal, and while there have been some hiccups they are incredibly quick to resolve things in a way that favors the customer (offering refunds and replacements instead of discounts and credits). They actually had a stock issue on my very first order and not only did they let me know as soon as they realized it, they gave me a refund within a few minutes of me deciding on that solution.
So far as I know they don't need to run any clinical trials so I feel safer working with them than Nexaph (for now).
nurseratchit
Research Enthusiast
ASC was my 2nd grey order and also a good experience for me. The only thing I noticed recently is that they only guarantee >98% purity whereas most other vendors guarantee >99%. I’ve reached out to Tuk about this but, as far as I know that hasn’t changed. My product tested over 99% but just something to keep in mind when considering future purchases. I would also be careful about using PayPal to send directly to a vendor. Have seen several people getting accounts shut down if PP deems it suspicious.
noteablequotable
Senior Member
I can confirm. I bought a mix of non- GLP-1 peps from them and 2/6 came back at 98%. When I asked about it they said that was standard, but they seemed open to discussing resolutions if I was unhappy. I dropped it since 98% is perfectly fine to use, but it's something to keep in mind.
nurseratchit
Research Enthusiast
Yeah, they are upfront about it at least. I told Tuk they might get more business if they had the same guarantee as most everyone else. I would probably still use over 98% too but then the next question that comes to my mind is the stuff that starts out at lower purity degrading at a faster rate.
JohnnyGobbs
New_Member
I’ve already taken so many leaps of faith (no prescription, grey market, Reta not even fda approved lol) that a 1% percent difference from some random UK test that’s over my head anyways isn’t gonna stop me from pinning lol.
