Again, Don’t doxx me bros
Only doxxing I saw was the doxxing of Alan by his own admission in a DM to Gibs.
Wait.... @zpped has some news to report..
Let's go to him in the newsroom.....
Again, Don’t doxx me bros
No, point number 1 was false also.
You said:
1) Sending packages with fake postage which can get people in trouble.
The truth is, that the packages were domestic and were underpaid in postage.
There was not fake or counterfeit postage affixed to the boxes.
And no one is going to get in trouble. They don't open domestic to domestic packages that are underpaid. They just leave a note that says, pick up "postage due".
You're the town crier. But all you do is report fake news.
View attachment 4360
Sure seems like the USPS considers it counterfeit. Postal Inspectors absolutely can seize these and investigate. At a minimum getting someone's address flagged.
Looks like a NIIMBOT sticker lolSuspect sticker. I'll ask my postman tomorrow at pickup if that's a real sticker or not.
I did a quick search and was able to find some examples of what the sticker normally looks likeI have never seen the postal service affix a sticker that looks like a NIIMBOT sticker to a piece of postage.
Looks like a NIIMBOT sticker lol
Ah damn someone beat me to it
I did a quick search and was able to find some examples of what the sticker normally looks likeView attachment 4364View attachment 4365
People want to start complaining about all types of things that are good. SRY and QSC are two of the best vendors. Yet people want to complain. Go ahead and pay more.Like I said. Sry sent me what I ordered and the lab verified it. I’d buy from them again
Again, Don’t doxx me bros
Thanks for your work on debunking the SRY hot pocket conspiracy theory. The funny thing is that the commonly used vendors all tend to be fairly reliable and are afraid of the losses they incur each time people get upset at them. I'm not claiming that there is no risk when you pay someone in China with crypto because there is, but particularly if you use the vendors that others people have been using, the risk is relatively low.Yeah, those look more official.
I'm not discounting that the sticker isn't official. It's just pretty amateur looking for something the post office would use frequently.
I do think it'll may get flagged counterfeit if there is no account debit card to charge for the overage on the sender's account and the return address is invalid.
But I don't think they'll likely seize the package and come get you in trouble for GLP1s. That's a stretch.
Thanks for your work on debunking the SRY hot pocket conspiracy theory. The funny thing is that the commonly used vendors all tend to be fairly reliable and are afraid of the losses they incur each time people get upset at them. I'm not claiming that there is no risk when you pay someone in China with crypto because there is, but particularly if you use the vendors that others people have been using, the risk is relatively low.
That person posted a receipt for $6.50.. and as you can see the only way you'd have to pay additional $6.50 per that table is if sender paid nothing (ie used fake label)... cause $6.50 is the standard rate.. USPS would collect the difference, not double dip. IOW.. Alan's explanation for that fiasco is complete nonsense..It's making a little more sense now.
They shipped Ground Advantage.
You really need to have the weights right or you'll get a postage due.
The pseudocode for that is something like
If postage due.
Then Attempt debit account on record for additional postage
If no account on record and postage is due.
Then return to sender
If sender return address is invalid..
and that's where I'm not sure... I know they'll just boomerang the package back if they can't autocharge your account for the overage.
And then if the return address is bunk I'm not sure what happens.
The tier system for weighed postage is not friendly. They would have done better to use flat rate boxes.
View attachment 4363
Where is the picture of the receipt for $6.50?That person posted a receipt for $6.50.. and as you can see the only way you'd have to pay additional $6.50 per that table is if sender paid nothing (ie used fake label)... cause $6.50 is the standard rate.. USPS would collect the difference, not double dip. IOW.. Alan's explanation for that fiasco is complete nonsense..
so this whole deal is over 6.50?
Facts first. 100%No.
I just cling to facts in an emotional world. And everyone was like "aren't you totally emotional about this?" and I was like "well let me see the facts". And then they said "I don't need to show you the facts, I already did this in PXXX and it's gone now". And that's when I was like.. "why you want to be all emotional about this?"
And Gibs tried gaslighting me.... others seem to really want to fry SRYLAB for one reason or another.
I proposed the narrative that Gibs and his buddy (I know at least one), orchestrated this over a long period of time. They probably are responsible for PXXX getting nuked as well so they could attribute that their fake narrative about Alan.
In a case without many facts presented, you have to run things through Occams and Hanlons Razor. That's when things start to fall apart.
And Gibs did exactly that. He ghosted the conversation when I pressed him.
I didn't even consider it could be a niimbot label but now that you mention itI have never seen the postal service affix a sticker that looks like a NIIMBOT sticker to a piece of postage.
It doesn't look genuine.
And it says in the partial on the real sticker on the left "underpaid"..
USPS always just uses ball point pen and writes right on the label for postage due.
I call an early FAKE NEWS on that shit. But I'll ask my postman (Aaron) at pickup tomorrow. Super nice guy... near retirement at the USPS.
I’m honestly a bit lost here, do we have any actual proof that the respected member faked the customs letter and postage they shared? From what I’ve seen, Alan’s defense is just a screenshot showing they had some personal beef with him, which doesn’t really prove anything about what happened later.Retraction: it looks like the hot packs person was not who I thought it was, so i take back my vouching for them. Trying to get to the bottom of how I came to be mistaken about who the allegations came from. Anyways sorry for contributing to the confusion, and @brentm I’m sorry for not entertaining your line of questioning. turns out the source here wasn’t as reliable as I had thought.
I’m honestly a bit lost here, do we have any actual proof that the respected member faked the customs letter and postage they shared? From what I’ve seen, Alan’s defense is just a screenshot showing they had some personal beef with him, which doesn’t really prove anything about what happened later.