We're Bashing SRY this time.

[Jailbreak7]

It's making a little more sense now.

They shipped Ground Advantage.

You really need to have the weights right or you'll get a postage due.

The pseudocode for that is something like

If postage due.
Then Attempt debit account on record for additional postage
If no account on record and postage is due.
Then return to sender
If sender return address is invalid..

and that's where I'm not sure... I know they'll just boomerang the package back if they can't autocharge your account for the overage.

And then if the return address is bunk I'm not sure what happens.

The tier system for weighed postage is not friendly. They would have done better to use flat rate boxes.





View attachment 4363

That person posted a receipt for $6.50.. and as you can see the only way you'd have to pay additional $6.50 per that table is if sender paid nothing (ie used fake label)... cause $6.50 is the standard rate.. USPS would collect the difference, not double dip. IOW.. Alan's explanation for that fiasco is complete nonsense..

 

[brentm]

That person posted a receipt for $6.50.. and as you can see the only way you'd have to pay additional $6.50 per that table is if sender paid nothing (ie used fake label)... cause $6.50 is the standard rate.. USPS would collect the difference, not double dip. IOW.. Alan's explanation for that fiasco is complete nonsense..

Where is the picture of the receipt for $6.50?

The sticker isn't a receipt. It's a sticker that has $6.50 written on it.

6.50 is the rate for 8 ounces to Zone 6. It's a specific rate zoned. It isn't "standard".

 

[raw_oyster_eater]

so this whole deal is over 6.50?

 

[brentm]

so this whole deal is over 6.50?

Summary seems to be that SRYLAB included prepaid labels to their "US Warehouse". And SRYLAB does not have an account to charge on file with USPS for underpaid postage.

I presume that when the package is attempted to be returned, the address is undeliverable.

At this point the postage gets flagged "counterfeit" and delivery+collection is attempted on the named recipient on the label.

Although it is flagged as counterfeit, and USPS may be well-within their right to open the package. They don't generally do this and will simply attempt to collect postage from the recipient. Yes, postage due was 6.50 because they rejected the underpayment on the label they deemed "counterfeit" due to invalid return address and no account with a card on-file to charge.

That's what I understand at this point.

I don't deny that SRYLAB has been riddled with issues lately. Shipping incorrect volume weights of Tirz, etc. But it seems to have been exacerbated with reports of fake news and completely fabricated accusations.

Right now I am inclined to believe that the picture of the package marked as counterfeit is genuine and USPS simply wants their money for the postage. Little to no risk for the recipient other than 6.50 in this case.

 

[SassyPants]

No.

I just cling to facts in an emotional world. And everyone was like "aren't you totally emotional about this?" and I was like "well let me see the facts". And then they said "I don't need to show you the facts, I already did this in PXXX and it's gone now". And that's when I was like.. "why you want to be all emotional about this?"

And Gibs tried gaslighting me.... others seem to really want to fry SRYLAB for one reason or another.

I proposed the narrative that Gibs and his buddy (I know at least one), orchestrated this over a long period of time. They probably are responsible for PXXX getting nuked as well so they could attribute that their fake narrative about Alan.

In a case without many facts presented, you have to run things through Occams and Hanlons Razor. That's when things start to fall apart.

And Gibs did exactly that. He ghosted the conversation when I pressed him.

Facts first. 100%

 

[clayd]

pretty disappointed we haven't got a big sry clearance event by now. i'm starting to think the 50 cents/mg threshold might be the commodity price for tirz, they all seem to be hesitant to breach that for retail pricing.

 

[Vicki]

I have never seen the postal service affix a sticker that looks like a NIIMBOT sticker to a piece of postage.

It doesn't look genuine.

And it says in the partial on the real sticker on the left "underpaid"..

USPS always just uses ball point pen and writes right on the label for postage due.

I call an early FAKE NEWS on that shit. But I'll ask my postman (Aaron) at pickup tomorrow. Super nice guy... near retirement at the USPS.

I didn't even consider it could be a niimbot label but now that you mention it

 

[Chub24Skin25]

Retraction: it looks like the hot packs person was not who I thought it was, so i take back my vouching for them. Trying to get to the bottom of how I came to be mistaken about who the allegations came from. Anyways sorry for contributing to the confusion, and @brentm I’m sorry for not entertaining your line of questioning. turns out the source here wasn’t as reliable as I had thought.

I’m honestly a bit lost here, do we have any actual proof that the respected member faked the customs letter and postage they shared? From what I’ve seen, Alan’s defense is just a screenshot showing they had some personal beef with him, which doesn’t really prove anything about what happened later.

I also saw Krysia’s post backing Alan, but that’s not surprising. She has a reputation for being petty, like banning people from The Swiss just for being surprised about her taking over 30 mg of Tirz at once or for questioning her motives for pushing TCI so hard. She probably got butthurt when the member told her to f-off after her “do you have any prove” comment.

 

[noteablequotable]

I’m honestly a bit lost here, do we have any actual proof that the respected member faked the customs letter and postage they shared? From what I’ve seen, Alan’s defense is just a screenshot showing they had some personal beef with him, which doesn’t really prove anything about what happened later.

No, we know nothing, and nothing has been solved. We're just a moving on, lol.

 

[Jackchel1102]

View attachment 4360

Sure seems like the USPS considers it counterfeit. Postal Inspectors absolutely can seize these and investigate. At a minimum getting someone's address flagged.

What they mean by counterfeit is the weight on the package does match what they just weighed it at.

You pay the postage by weight. So the weight this post office has is not what is on the postage from SYR - making the customer pay the difference. Alan said if that happens, he would pay you the charge. It doesn’t mean what’s in the bag is counterfeit.

To be honest, 7$ shouldn’t even big that big of deal.

 

[zpped]

What they mean by counterfeit is the weight on the package does match what they just weighed it at.

You pay the postage by weight. So the weight this post office has is not what is on the postage from SYR - making the customer pay the difference. Alan said if that happens, he would pay you the charge. It doesn’t mean what’s in the bag is counterfeit.

To be honest, 7$ shouldn’t even big that big of deal.

You're not following the conversation because no one suggested the contents were counterfeit. Doesn't matter the $ is, the post office considers it a big deal. Don't strawman this.

 

[Chub24Skin25]

W

No, we know nothing, and nothing has been solved. We're just a moving on, lol.

I’d like to think we’re being careful about this. Turning against a respected member so quickly while letting a vendor with a shady history slide could have serious consequences for customers if the claims are true. We shouldn’t let them off the hook without solid proof that the member is lying.

 

[zpped]

No, we know nothing, and nothing has been solved. We're just a moving on, lol.

I’d like to think we’re being careful about this. Turning against a respected member so quickly while letting a vendor with a shady history slide could have serious consequences for customers if the claims are true. We shouldn’t let them off the hook without solid proof that the member is lying.

I've already confirmed with the testing group that they are keeping a warning on sry (which is extremely rare for them to do). swiss has really jumped the gun on declaring this over. But no one is ever going to have proof of anything because it's just not possible.

 

[Chizikitide-1977]

I've already confirmed with the testing group that they are keeping a warning on sry (which is extremely rare for them to do). swiss has really jumped the gun on declaring this over. But no one is ever going to have proof of anything because it's just not possible.

Is PTDS back?

 

[Chili]

GLP Mafia is insane

 

[keangkong]

It seems like the vendors have far more to fear than the consumers. Meanwhile QSC and SRY continue to deliver good products at great prices while always simultaneously being harshly criticized in these forums.

 

[keangkong]

You're not following the conversation because no one suggested the contents were counterfeit. Doesn't matter the $ is, the post office considers it a big deal. Don't strawman this.

But the post office didn’t consider it a big deal. They just wanted the postage paid.

 

[keangkong]

W

I’d like to think we’re being careful about this. Turning against a respected member so quickly while letting a vendor with a shady history slide could have serious consequences for customers if the claims are true. We shouldn’t let them off the hook without solid proof that the member is lying.

We’re not talking about a respected member. We’re taking about a person who has admitted to impersonating SRY sales reps on the SRY discord.

 

[keangkong]

The only place selling tirzepatide you can really trust is Eli Lilly. Everyone else is worried about profits.

 

[Chub24Skin25]

We’re not talking about a respected member. We’re taking about a person who has admitted to impersonating SRY sales reps on the SRY discord.

I’m not sure why you’re calling this impersonation when the “fake” account clearly used his username. That seems more like mocking, taunting, or passive-aggressive trolling than actual impersonation. Just to clarify, I’ve never interacted with this member or dealt with this vendor, but the accusations being made are far too serious to dismiss or discredit the member simply because they’ve had issues with a vendor that already has a questionable track record.