Nexaph testing

[husla22]

Apparently nexa/baba/ezp lowered purity guarantee to 98% for everything other than glp1s, guess they got tired of having to keep replacing all that substandard product they’ve been sending out.

They have temporarily lowered the guarantee to 98% because they are having to use a new API. The API guarantees 99% but they don't know without testing a batch. Once the API has been confirmed as high quality I'm sure the guaranty will go back to 99%. There have been problems with API's in China recently, hence the need to switch.

GLP1 peptides are HIGHLY profitable therefore the API used for them is still the same with the same guarantees as before.

 

[exploitedworkerbee]

They have temporarily lowered the guarantee to 98% because they are having to use a new API. The API guarantees 99% but they don't know without testing a batch. Once the API has been confirmed as high quality I'm sure the guaranty will go back to 99%. There have been problems with API's in China recently, hence the need to switch.

GLP1 peptides are HIGHLY profitable therefore the API used for them is still the same.

they caught several sub-99 tests though, which seems to conflict with the “alls well this is just in case” story

 

[GimmeABreak]

They have temporarily lowered the guarantee to 98% because they are having to use a new API. The API guarantees 99% but they don't know without testing a batch. Once the API has been confirmed as high quality I'm sure the guaranty will go back to 99%. There have been problems with API's in China recently, hence the need to switch.

GLP1 peptides are HIGHLY profitable therefore the API used for them is still the same.

They lowered the purity guarantee for NON GLP-1 peptides, Tirz, Reta, Sema, etc are all still 99%

 

[husla22]

they caught several sub-99 tests though, which seems to conflict with the “alls well this is just in case” story

I'm not getting into an argument with you, but in my experience, they have one of the highest levels of transparency. What I ordered had a very high purity and I am going to send for endotoxin screening and sterility soon but they have posted sterility reports from other users that have passed. I'm talking proper USP 71 sterility and not Janoshik sterility.

They had a test result for something come out below 99% on one vial (out of three tested) and sent out replacements for free for everyone that ordered it and people could keep the original vials.

While I'm sure you can find individuals who had a bad experience with them, we have to look at things holistically and this company seems to be very transparent with a high % of repeat customers.

 

[clevesand]

I think the alarming thing with Nexaph is they're the only ones having this issue right now, and we've all pretty much figured out this stuff comes for 2 or 3 major players in China. So here is this company coming onto the market with something that is not in line with what everyone else is seeing. To me this means they're using a channel that is different--and frankly not very good. Coincidentally, it also comes at a time where we are seeing record low prices. This makes me think there is a disruptor in China up to some shit. Lowering prices, and not as good. I think the best time to buy was a couple of months ago. Anyone in the market right now my best advice is to wait and see a little bit. But do your thing.

 

[Blimey]

I think the alarming thing with Nexaph is they're the only ones having this issue right now, and we've all pretty much figured out this stuff comes for 2 or 3 major players in China. So here is this company coming onto the market with something that is not in line with what everyone else is seeing. To me this means they're using a channel that is different--and frankly not very good. Coincidentally, it also comes at a time where we are seeing record low prices. This makes me think there is a disruptor in China up to some shit. Lowering prices, and not as good. I think the best time to buy was a couple of months ago. Anyone in the market right now my best advice is to wait and see a little bit. But do your thing.

They tried a different filler or whatever it’s called, one batch. They reshipped for everyone who ordered that batch. Everyone has their own opinion and risk threshold but 98% seems great to me.

The nice thing is we have multiple options for sources so everyone can do business with who they are comfortable with.

 

[cta7978]

They tried a different filler or whatever it’s called, one batch. They reshipped for everyone who ordered that batch. Everyone has their own opinion and risk threshold but 98% seems great to me.

The nice thing is we have multiple options for sources so everyone can do business with who they are comfortable with.

Trying different fillers.... Reminds me of Aminos Research. I find it curious that AR shut down about the same time Nexaph site came online...

 

[zpped]

in my experience, they have one of the highest levels of transparency.

I'm curious how much experience that is? Because this is a VERY funny statement.

They tried a different filler or whatever it’s called, one batch.

Do you not see how insanely dangerous that is? They are experimenting on you without even telling you.

 

[noteablequotable]

Do you not see how insanely dangerous that is? They are experimenting on you without even telling you.

I know you're not a fan but this is a little much. Manufacturers do not consult us about the fillers they use, we don't ask about them, and there is no evidence that the new filler is dangerous (Janoshik recognized it). Unless we start asking everyone about their fillers as standard practice this is not something to get upset about.

 

[peptideusername]

I know you're not a fan but this is a little much. Manufacturers do not consult us about the fillers they use, we don't ask about them, and there is no evidence that the new filler is dangerous (Janoshik recognized it). Unless we start asking everyone about their fillers as standard practice this is not something to get upset about.

I think this should be a regular question to ask. Why not? It used to just be mannitol, but now we have a reason to ask!

 

[penewbie]

Do you not see how insanely dangerous that is? They are experimenting on you without even telling you.

INSANELY dangerous?

Do you think they're using cyanide as filler?

 

[zpped]

I know you're not a fan but this is a little much. Manufacturers do not consult us about the fillers they use, we don't ask about them, and there is no evidence that the new filler is dangerous (Janoshik recognized it). Unless we start asking everyone about their fillers as standard practice this is not something to get upset about.

I didn't say the filler was dangerous. I said experimenting and not telling people about it is dangerous. The fact this is a controversial statement is mind boggling.

Of course we should hold every vendor to the same standard. Let me know which other one has been caught tinkering with the formula and hasn't been dragged for it?

 

[noteablequotable]

I think this should be a regular question to ask. Why not? It used to just be mannitol, but now we have a reason to ask!

That's fine by me then, as long as we aren't setting different standards for different people.

 

[noteablequotable]

I didn't say the filler was dangerous. I said experimenting and not telling people about it is dangerous. The fact this is a controversial statement is mind boggling.

Of course we should hold every vendor to the same standard. Let me know which other one has been caught tinkering with the formula and hasn't been dragged for it?

I don't think it's fair to call it an "experiment" if it's a known excipient though. Imho using a different filler isn't tinkering with the formula as long as the active ingredients (Tirzepatide, Retatrutide, etc.) doesn't change, and it's a a known, safe, excipient that doesn't pose a risk to human health.

I can't recall the name off the top of my head but I don't believe any of those things are an issue with the excipient he chose, so unless we want to start demanding manufacturers only use specific excipients there's nothing to be upset about.

 

[zpped]

I don't think it's fair to call it an "experiment" if it's a known excipient though. Imho using a different filler isn't tinkering with the formula as long as the active ingredients (Tirzepatide, Retatrutide, etc.) doesn't change, and it's a a known, safe, excipient that doesn't pose a risk to human health.

I can't recall the name off the top of my head but I don't believe any of those things are an issue with the excipient he chose, so unless we want to start demanding manufacturers only use specific excipients there's nothing to be upset about.

The fact is he changed the ingredients to something completely novel in tirz without telling his customers. You, I, Jano, Cain, and everyone else doesn't actually know the effects of using that ingredient with tirz. Calling it an experiment is generous.

We absolutely should hold every vendor to the same standard, I don't think anyone has said otherwise and its weird you keep repeating it.

 

[Bbnp1]

Its not changing an ingredient of the main peptide, every manufacturer is using excipients to prevent degradation and those excipients are well known

 

[zpped]

Its not changing an ingredient of the main peptide

ingredient in the vial of tirz... aka excipients. I'm very aware of exactly what happened.

every manufacturer is using excipients to prevent degradation and those excipients are well known

Who said they didn't? Yes they are well known and fairly standard. This specific excipient isn't well known in this use case because no one has used it with glp1s before. which is why Jano called it out.

 

[Nikki nik]

Trying different fillers.... Reminds me of Aminos Research. I find it curious that AR shut down about the same time Nexaph site came online...

I said the same dang thing