You should allow anonymous reviews. I wouldn't leave anything but 5 star reviews for the fear of vendor doxxing and receiving fentanyl in my next vial.
We're Bashing SRY this time.
- Thread starter zpped
- Start date
zpped
Research Enthusiast
I believe you can message swiss for anonymous reviews.
I’m going by what Gibs said …have screenshots linking the dates . Funny as I found several posts from him in the other forum specifically saying that there is no proof without seeing any evidence yet here he is refusing to provide any evidence . Anyway this case has taken up too much of my time now and I’m moving on to my next case unless some new information arrives. I’m not in USA so I had to be told about informed delivery .
SassyPants
Member
That is just fucking embarrassing.
zpped
Research Enthusiast
I'm not sure that's really scandalous in any way.
Actually pretty shitty to post that on a public forum. I have no idea who SRY uses for their warehouse. But I'm sure they wish to remain private.
w
with everything coming out about her, I would not want that lady to have any of my personal information. it's a shit show.
lol ok
To clarify I’m pretty sure this is someone called “peptide princess” that is different from the one we all know and love from PTDS and related servers. The OG peptide princess didn’t break bad
zpped
Research Enthusiast
good point. I was thinking from the perspective of I don't particularly care who is operating the local warehouse. But I guess this particular individual has shown themselves to not be stable.
with the way you carry on with other's personal information, it's no wonder you worry about your own.
thanks for clarifying! had no idea there was more than one. and with all the aliases and people involved in this drama, it's been a bit hard to follow. it's almost like a mafia movie.
I have no dog in either of these fights and don't know any of the people involved, but what I do know is that putting faith in someones online reputation alone, no matter how well you think you know them, is probably not the best idea. We've seen at least one recent example of that.
Am I crazy for reading through this and still thinking SRY is possibly the best vendor for my situation / needs? Probably. However, being new to all of this and reading through as much as I can, looking at all the vendor posts, the reviews / rumors etc on each, I can't find another vendor that has:
1) The lowest prices
2) Testing (and no doubt about actual product, or at least not anything worse than countless other vendors who are nonetheless trusted)
3) domestic USA shipping (for speed / convenience / lower risk / cost)
4) Payment options of PayPal and aliblahblah. I'm not messing with crypto or bank wires.
The only other competitive vendor is QSC, but they lose out on the USA warehouse factor (and maybe the payment options? idk). The rest are either not keeping up with current pricing trends, or charge $40+ for what is essentially free / cheap / bottom of barrel shipping costs that Chinese pay for shipping to USA, or don't provide testing or long out of date testing.
No I don't work for SRY nor have even ordered from them yet, nor gaf. Just my thoughts as a newbie evaluating vendors and deciding what is important to me. Everyone need to decide for themselves which factors are important for them
1) The lowest prices
2) Testing (and no doubt about actual product, or at least not anything worse than countless other vendors who are nonetheless trusted)
3) domestic USA shipping (for speed / convenience / lower risk / cost)
4) Payment options of PayPal and aliblahblah. I'm not messing with crypto or bank wires.
The only other competitive vendor is QSC, but they lose out on the USA warehouse factor (and maybe the payment options? idk). The rest are either not keeping up with current pricing trends, or charge $40+ for what is essentially free / cheap / bottom of barrel shipping costs that Chinese pay for shipping to USA, or don't provide testing or long out of date testing.
No I don't work for SRY nor have even ordered from them yet, nor gaf. Just my thoughts as a newbie evaluating vendors and deciding what is important to me. Everyone need to decide for themselves which factors are important for them
Last edited:
chmuse
Public Nuisance 🦜🐧🦅🦚🦃🦢🐓🦆🦉
There are plenty of people who feel the same as you and are still using sry. That's why everyone says to research the vendors yourself- everyone's cost/benefit and risk/reward profile will be different.
stickfigure
Member
I would never touch SRY after the opioid indictment.
That's literally the leading cause of death under 45 in the US. I know people who died from fentanyl they were not expecting to get.
If you don't care about people dying from opioids, you may at least care about popping up on government radar for dealing with an indicted international drug dealer.
That's literally the leading cause of death under 45 in the US. I know people who died from fentanyl they were not expecting to get.
If you don't care about people dying from opioids, you may at least care about popping up on government radar for dealing with an indicted international drug dealer.
This is such a silly and cheap slight. You are trying to create a box that I must not care about illegal drug deaths, or I need to order elsewhere. I reject your childish shaming completely.
We are all buying substances from gray market Chinese drug makers. You have zero idea what else any of them are doing, and I assure you it's not all above board.
In addition, a compounding company selling compounds that could be precursors to an illegal drug doesn't really surprise me nor concern me. So does my local pharmacy, herbal compound sellers, and dozens of others. This is not selling fentanyl.
If you have lofty moral standards and concerns about the tangential possibilities of companies you do business with, then go hang out on the Lilly forum and not the illicit experimental gray market drug forum.
Either way, I dismiss your point entirely just based on your manipulative language and attempt to stain my position.
stickfigure
Member
I assume you didn’t read the indictment, did you? Otherwise, you wouldn’t have mentioned any kind of precursor. They were indicted for attempting to sell a synthetic opioid that is stronger than fentanyl and has no medical use whatsoever. It is solely used to cut drugs, without the knowledge of unsuspecting users, who end up dying from overdoses of substances for which they have no tolerance.
Most people who die from opioids like fentanyl never intended to consume it. It was added by drug dealers to increase their profits.
Your comparison to Lilly makes no sense. Lilly doesn't mix deadly drugs into other substances for unsuspecting users and is not involved in this business.
Your whole post is a sorry attempt to find excuse for your greed for lower prices without any moral compass.
raw_oyster_eater
lemon bottle brewer
people have free will to do whatever they choose. if it wasn't fentanyl, it'd be something else.
no we do not care at all.
no we do not care at all.
scarywood75
Scarlett Johansson
Relax, you may as well pop a few xan
Trending content
-
-
-
-
Thread 'Patients scramble as cheaper obesity drug alternatives disappear'
- StopCraving_12
Replies: 52 -
