noteablequotable
GLP-1 Specialist
I don't know if "Tracy's level of support" is much of a selling point for using his team 🤣
Well, according to @violetv things can always get worse.
I don't know if "Tracy's level of support" is much of a selling point for using his team 🤣
I'm enjoying seeing the mythical Tracy tongue lashing91 replies and 1000 views about $40?
Well, it's 135 for me, I haven't heard back from "my" sales rep... But it could easily be $1035 next time for someone else.91 replies and 1000 views about $40?
Same! She’s just as rude!! I also have an issue with a Black Friday order and her response as blown me away. Unprofessional and rude.. they sent my package to the wrong address even after I corrected them in the email they sent me to “verify” everything was correct. Now she tells me that it is not their policy to confirm info yet the first sentence in her email is “please confirm “So when I emailed Tracy, someone named Bella responded. I used the contact info Tracy posted.
Does that absolve Tracy of any issues should something come up?
I don't understand a WhatsApp link. It seems I have to use browser based Whatsapp to access the channel.Follow the Qindgao Sigma Chemical😊 channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaqc8hREawdlb1Tpwg10
Here's one place...
I look at both and had no idea that there were different sales teams. The deals are the same.
Like most normal people, I thought it was all one company.
i thought they were to give you a 95 dollar credit. i've never heard of anyone losing their money on the whole order.Well, it's 135 for me, I haven't heard back from "my" sales rep... But it could easily be $1035 next time for someone else.
At least now we know that QSC has multiple reps, and even those reps can be different people. AND those reps don't work with each other.
I actually didn't think Alisa was ever one person and I didn't care as long as I got the order.
🤷♂️
The issue is there's no accountability when there's an issue. My orders went fine for years since 2021 and I've probably spent plenty more than you but if there's such an issue over $135 then I'm not comfortable risking a larger order.
I don't actually read many forums and when I began ordering from them they didn't have a terrible reputation.So you've been ordering from QSC for years while people went around yelling from the mountain tops about how terrible their service is and how often people walked away feeling screwed over?
So you just thought, fuck it, it's not happening to me.... until it did.
I make no secret my dislike of QSC. I'm just sick of people coming here to complain about them.
Bella, jessica, lydia, nia, ada, lucy.. are my assistants who reply to sigma@sigmachemical.com.cnSo when I emailed Tracy, someone named Bella responded. I used the contact info Tracy posted.
Does that absolve Tracy of any issues should something come up?
Where did find this other QSC sales rep? I don't think it is posted here or on any of the other boards I visit.
Who are you switching to?I've ordered thousands worth of product with Qsc previously without any problems but I decided to try one of their pre-order deals.
After patiently waiting for months they told me that it was "out of stock" they basically didn't produce enough. I said fine, I'll just wait longer but then was told that it won't be possible and to use the credit for another order.
Then recently they had the black Friday deal and I thought fine, I get some tirz. They confirm the order but days later when I asked for shipping confirmation they tell me that their accounting department said I was short funds.
I sent BTC payment and the amounts are all confirmed on the Blockchain.
I'm not sure what's going on with them but they really seem to be screwing around for a few bucks.
This is their message
Btw, my order total was 1065 + 135 (pre-order)=1200. So shouldn't 1277-1065 be 212?
So after they screw up my preorder, 3 months later they tell me that I didn't pay enough?
They didn't care to compensate me for their mistake and now it seems that they have accounting issues which are ridiculous because you can clearly see the transaction amounts on the Blockchain.
![]()
Bitcoin transaction f8f1b55272142ad23b81e342f982d0654ea9261024368045edca43bee54912e9
Inspect Bitcoin transaction f8f1b55272142ad23b81e342f982d0654ea9261024368045edca43bee54912e9: check hash, date, and event details with Blockchair.blockchair.com
![]()
Bitcoin transaction cd5f192586bca02cd92d9545f7a19a348123d22bf679a4f32ccfd258790417f0
Inspect Bitcoin transaction cd5f192586bca02cd92d9545f7a19a348123d22bf679a4f32ccfd258790417f0: check hash, date, and event details with Blockchair.blockchair.com
![]()
Bitcoin transaction 22d5f7650812a5b1bfc640059fc7a9d2bed2590008c65cbabae4d8ce489df573
Inspect Bitcoin transaction 22d5f7650812a5b1bfc640059fc7a9d2bed2590008c65cbabae4d8ce489df573: check hash, date, and event details with Blockchair.blockchair.com
View attachment 4132View attachment 4133View attachment 4134
So far they have stopped replying to me. I'm not sure what their issue is but I'm definitely switching vendors. I've tried another one and their response was superb and even if the price is maybe 5% more it's worth it for the service and response.
Edit: I did add an item to my order for 115 which is the BTC transaction for 115.
Wait, so let me get this straight…you’re complaining over $135 when you’ve spent “thousands” of dollars which in turn has saved you 10’s of thousands of dollars in total? Say you bought those same items individually at companies like polaris, peptide sciences etc, it would have cost a lot more, right? So then while we’re at it can we also blame QSC for undercharging you? I didn’t think so. You should be saying, “Thank you for all the money you’ve saved me over the years, here’s a $135 tip, as a token of my appreciation for fucking up. I’m gonna shut up now, and learn about stable coins so I can use that in the future because I’m still learning about bitcoin.”Well, it's 135 for me, I haven't heard back from "my" sales rep... But it could easily be $1035 next time for someone else.
At least now we know that QSC has multiple reps, and even those reps can be different people. AND those reps don't work with each other.
I actually didn't think Alisa was ever one person and I didn't care as long as I got the order.
🤷♂️
The price has nothing to do with this situation. I agreed to pay for a product and expect to receive that product.Wait, so let me get this straight…you’re complaining over $135 when you’ve spent “thousands” of dollars which in turn has saved you 10’s of thousands of dollars in total? Say you bought those same items individually at companies like polaris, peptide sciences etc, it would have cost a lot more, right? So then while we’re at it can we also blame QSC for undercharging you? I didn’t think so. You should be saying, “Thank you for all the money you’ve saved me over the years, here’s a $135 tip, as a token of my appreciation for fucking up. I’m gonna shut up now, and learn about stable coins so I can use that in the future because I’m still learning about bitcoin.”
Trying Sigma AudleyWho are you switching to?
I do. Is there something wrong with that?You probably thank your meth dealer after giving him head and still paying him cash to show your appreciation, don't you.
Nope, not at all... No judgement. 😘I do. Is there something wrong with that?
Sigma Audley was banned for this forum for having fake users post glowing reviews. That is a good reason for banning them. With that said, from what I've heard Sigma Audley is a reliable source. I hope they are; I recently ordered a non-GLP-1 product from them.Trying Sigma Audley
Sigma Audley was banned for this forum for having fake users post glowing reviews. That is a good reason for banning them. With that said, from what I've heard Sigma Audley is a reliable source. I hope they are; I recently ordered a non-GLP-1 product from them.
Ohh, I wasn't aware they were banned for that but I did make a small order of non-peptides and it arrived quickly. Not trying to promote them though.Sigma Audley was banned for this forum for having fake users post glowing reviews. That is a good reason for banning them. With that said, from what I've heard Sigma Audley is a reliable source. I hope they are; I recently ordered a non-GLP-1 product from them.
While I believe Tracy is not the cause of your problem, I agree that lack of a manager-type at QSC who is empowered to fix things has got to be frustrating.I don't actually read many forums and when I began ordering from them they didn't have a terrible reputation.
I was fine dealing with slow shipments or occasional delays.
So, yeah I might have been ordering from them while they got worse but that still doesn't mean that I shouldn't share my experience with others.
I don't really care about the money, I just want to know that my supplier is going to be reliable and honest.
I'm sure that this post is going to be very informative to many people and has been productive in figuring out how business operations are run at QSC.
Though this complaining about my complaint is not so productive.
Bella, jessica, lydia, nia, ada, lucy.. are my assistants who reply to sigma@sigmachemical.com.cn
That's what's great about belonging to this forum. I learn that much of what I thought I knew is wrong. Thank you for correcting my misinformation and letting me know to be skeptical of Sigma Audley.It's reliable, right up until it isn't.
A customer posted this on the telegram group of someone who doesn't use the escalator:
View attachment 4179
Disappointing results from my recent SSA 10mg Reta purchase - 91.9%
From Peptide Test:
“The results for your sample came back significantly outside of the expected range. Given this deviation, which exceeded our established parameters, an internal review was triggered to verify the accuracy of the testing. After this review, the results were confirmed as valid. While unexpected results can sometimes be linked to issues in manufacturing, handling, or other factors, we always ensure that no lab error has occurred before reporting them.”
I understand. This is the link to the ban notification: https://glp1forum.com/threads/sigma-audley-beware.387/Ohh, I wasn't aware they were banned for that but I did make a small order of non-peptides and it arrived quickly. Not trying to promote them though.
You should be skeptical of every source, every time. That's the important lesson.That's what's great about belonging to this forum. I learn that much of what I thought I knew is wrong. Thank you for correcting my misinformation and letting me know to be skeptical of Sigma Audley.
I think violet's completely wrong in a number of things... but you're being absurd. Your drug dealer isn't your friend. None of them are doing this out the goodness of their heart and they don't deserve our gratitude for anything.Wait, so let me get this straight…you’re complaining over $135 when you’ve spent “thousands” of dollars which in turn has saved you 10’s of thousands of dollars in total? Say you bought those same items individually at companies like polaris, peptide sciences etc, it would have cost a lot more, right? So then while we’re at it can we also blame QSC for undercharging you? I didn’t think so. You should be saying, “Thank you for all the money you’ve saved me over the years, here’s a $135 tip, as a token of my appreciation for fucking up. I’m gonna shut up now, and learn about stable coins so I can use that in the future because I’m still learning about bitcoin.”
Thanks for the heads up!I understand. This is the link to the ban notification: https://glp1forum.com/threads/sigma-audley-beware.387/
You’re right, I know nothing about the “blockchair explorer”. No wonder you’re short $135 🤦♂️It seems like you know nothing about Bitcoin when you can clearly see the correct value of the coin was sent through the blockchair explorer. It's there for all to see, it's on the Blockchain it's immutable.
The same debate about qsc exists on meso around the value of harm reduction. New members will go for the vendor with the most traffic, but this vendor in particular sells unfinished oils (they need to be filtered) and most new members have no idea what that means. They don’t really have a good solution either except banning discussion about sources from most topics.